Portfolio Overview
Ownership & Control Structure
What Companies Does Mikaila Ulmer Own?
Mikaila Ulmer founded Me & the Bees Lemonade in Austin in 2009. The beverage business grew out of a stand and began selling commercially under the BeeSweet Lemonade name. Honey and flaxseed helped distinguish its recipe from other ready-to-drink lemonades. The business subsequently reached grocery chains, with Emory reporting in 2025 that it was stocked in more than 600 stores nationwide. Ulmer's ownership percentage is private.
The company has brought in outside capital. In 2015, Ulmer's appearance on Shark Tank resulted in a $60,000 investment from Daymond John, according to Emory. A group of current and former football players led by Arian Foster later invested in the brand. The investments helped broaden the set of people with an economic interest in the operation. Neither event gives an up-to-date split of the equity between Ulmer, her family and the company's backers.
The current Me & the Bees Lemonade lineup includes Classic, Black Cherry, Prickly Pear, Passion Fruit and Very Berry. These are flavors developed and sold within the same business. We regard the expansion as a way to earn more shelf space and attract more occasions for purchase, with the financial upside going through the beverage company. Grocery customers such as Whole Foods and H-E-B provide distribution and a way to reach shoppers who would rarely order a case directly.
In 2016, Ulmer also founded the Healthy Hive Foundation to support pollinator conservation. It pursues education, habitat protection and research as a nonprofit. Its role in the brand's story is closely connected to the product's ingredients and original purpose. The relationship gives the brand an enduring theme for outreach while leaving equity ownership in the beverage company. Ulmer's book extends that public work through publishing, a separate source of potential earnings whose financial terms are private.
Portfolio Analysis
The growing flavor lineup gives Me & the Bees Lemonade a wider range of products with much of the same underlying financial exposure. The flavors nevertheless share a production system, a brand identity and most of their retail channels. A rise in honey prices can put pressure on several products together. The sales of Classic and Passion Fruit may respond differently to a promotion, but problems with packaging supply or shipping capacity can affect both simultaneously. That makes the company a concentrated exposure for its founder.
A wider network of retail accounts can reduce dependence on a single buyer. Whole Foods gave Mikaila Ulmer early proof that consumers would buy the drink inside a grocery store, and the company expanded to other retailers. We would focus on distribution that stays productive after the introductory period. Selling steadily through several accounts diversifies purchasing decisions more effectively than adding a large number of doors that reorder only intermittently or require expensive promotions.
The Healthy Hive Foundation, founded in 2016, reaches people through conservation programs. Its conservation programs address the pollinators linked to the brand's use of honey. The foundation can reinforce customers' familiarity with Ulmer's story and introduce people to the company outside a store. Its assets are dedicated to nonprofit purposes. A buyer of the beverage business could put a value on its reputation and customer loyalty without acquiring the right to withdraw the foundation's funds.
Mikaila Ulmer's 2020 book creates another possible route to income with a different production and distribution chain. Book demand can rise after public appearances, and an individual book sale imposes little on the beverage operation. It would take disclosed royalties or other payments to judge the size of the contribution to her overall finances. Me & the Bees remains the operating asset most exposed to ongoing investment in inventory, distribution and packaging, and the one whose commercial results matter most to her business ownership.
Business Profile
A customer can buy Me & the Bees Lemonade by picking up a drink at a retailer or ordering a multipack. The grocery channel gives the brand recurring access to shoppers, but the economics depend on what the company keeps after freight, retailer allowances and manufacturing. A case sold directly can yield a different price and require the brand to pay for individual order handling. The relevant comparison is contribution after the costs of serving each channel.
The 2024 switch from glass bottles to aluminum cans changes how a case moves through the supply chain. Lighter packages can reduce freight for the same number of servings, while a can design can change how the drink fits on shelves and in coolers. We would weigh those benefits against production minimums, packaging supplier terms and the expense of changing labels or running overlapping stocks during the transition. The shift works financially if the combined effect improves unit costs or demand.
Adding Passion Fruit and Very Berry in 2024 gave stores more ways to merchandise the line. A second flavor can introduce a new buyer to the brand, especially when the existing lineup does not cover the buyer's preferred taste. It can also replace a sale that would otherwise have gone to one of the established flavors. The difference matters for total demand as well as forecasting production and keeping older inventory moving.
Emory's account of the first commercial batches of Me & the Bees Lemonade highlights the value of an outside kitchen with bottling capability. Using a partner can let an emerging drink business test volume before investing in equipment. More distribution introduces a different challenge. Regular deliveries, production consistency and fill rates become part of the economics of a supermarket relationship. The scale of the opportunity at Me & the Bees depends on growing the brand's contribution per case while meeting those operational demands reliably.
Controlled Businesses
Companies Currently Owned or Controlled
- Me & the Bees Lemonade
| Company | Relationship | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Me & the Bees Lemonade | Founder and owner | Founder | 2009 |
Control & Capital Allocation Analysis
Mikaila Ulmer remained the public founder through the move from a lemonade stand to national distribution. That continuity matters because the brand uses her recipe story and connection to bee conservation. It does not reveal the votes assigned to each class of shares. Daymond John's investment and the later participation of football players broadened the ownership base. Their arrival illustrates the difference between having a recognizable founder and knowing who can approve major corporate actions.
Mikaila Ulmer's parents helped her find commercial bottling capacity during the early expansion, according to Emory. That support addressed a constraint a young founder could not readily solve at a stand. As a brand reaches more accounts, the operator deciding how much inventory to authorize can have as much immediate effect on cash needs as the person approving a marketing campaign. We see the capacity to separate those responsibilities as increasingly important when grocery orders begin arriving from multiple channels.
In 2025, national accounts such as H-E-B exercised commercial influence through shelf placement, promotions and ordering patterns. They can shape choices about case format or delivery timing by deciding what works in their own stores. These pressures are different from shareholder voting rights. Ulmer's beverage company must negotiate both kinds of relationship when allocating money to a new flavor or package. Retail acceptance can make a launch feasible, while governance determines which risks the company is willing to assume.
The commercial interest of Me & the Bees Lemonade extends to the brand's environmental associations, and Healthy Hive has a mission to protect pollinators. Ulmer's involvement with both organizations creates continuity of purpose. Financial accountability still attaches to each organization individually. A corporate expense to support beverage distribution can be judged on unit sales and margins. The foundation's allocation of resources needs to be judged against its nonprofit purposes, including the reach and effectiveness of habitat protection and education.
Minority Stakes, Investments & Brands
Brands, Products & Licensing
- Classic LemonadeLemonade flavor
- Black Cherry LemonadeLemonade flavor
- Prickly Pear LemonadeLemonade flavor
- Passion Fruit LemonadeLemonade flavor
- Very Berry LemonadeLemonade flavor
| Name | Type | Legal Owner or Relationship | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Classic Lemonade | Lemonade flavor | Me & the Bees Lemonade | Active |
| Black Cherry Lemonade | Lemonade flavor | Me & the Bees Lemonade | Active |
| Prickly Pear Lemonade | Lemonade flavor | Me & the Bees Lemonade | Active |
| Passion Fruit Lemonade | Lemonade flavor | Me & the Bees Lemonade | Active |
| Very Berry Lemonade | Lemonade flavor | Me & the Bees Lemonade | Active |
Minority-Stake & Investment Analysis
Daymond John's $60,000 investment arrived when wider retail distribution was beginning to matter to Me & the Bees. The capital could help address the lag between paying to produce a beverage and collecting from stores. A backer with consumer-brand experience can also contribute advice on packaging and distribution. We consider that practical support potentially material at a time when the company was converting local demand into the ability to supply more accounts regularly.
The Arian Foster-led investment reported in 2017 added a set of backers with reach outside the beverage industry. For a small drink business, publicity can accelerate trials without funding a full advertising campaign. Sales after that initial exposure are a better test of financial value. Distribution must be ready to capture demand, and consumers must buy again once the story is familiar. The investment can create a better opportunity to test demand while the operation bears responsibility for converting it into sales.
Ulmer's spending choices inside the company also matter. Launching two flavors in 2024 meant committing money to finished inventory before knowing how the products would sell alongside established varieties. The return depends on incremental gross profit from the combined lineup. If a grocery account replaces slower-moving drinks with higher-turning products from the brand, the new flavors can improve the economics of the relationship. If they mostly divide the existing demand, they can increase complexity without improving margins.
The 2024 move into cans required another allocation of capital. Costs can arrive before savings, since equipment arrangements, printed packaging and stocking transitions have to be in place for retailers to switch. Broader distribution can let the brand spread those expenses over more cases. The choice of production quantities remains important because beverage demand is seasonal and inventory consumes cash while it sits. Funding for the business becomes more valuable when it matches the timing of these purchase and collection cycles.
Transactions, Acquisitions & Exits
Transaction & Exit Analysis
The transition from BeeSweet Lemonade to Me & the Bees Lemonade broadened the brand identity as the business grew. A new label can require fresh packaging, retailer coordination and an effort to carry existing shoppers across to the new name. The underlying continuity matters to ownership. The company's history treats BeeSweet as an earlier identity, and the continued use of the recipe and mission helped the business retain the recognition earned under that name.
The 2015 Shark Tank investment was a financing milestone. Daymond John put $60,000 into the venture according to Emory. A founder selling all her shares would give up an economic interest in future growth, whereas new capital can let an operating company fund that growth alongside its original owner. Ulmer continued to build the brand after the television appearance, and later backers joined while the company continued expanding its retail presence.
Whole Foods provided Me & the Bees Lemonade access to grocery shoppers. We regard that arrangement as a commercial agreement whose value depends on what happens after a product enters a store. Orders, consumer demand and renewals can be valuable to the producer while the retailer remains a customer or distribution partner. News coverage referring to a large retail deal describes a different event from a buyer paying to acquire the company or the founder receiving cash for her stake.
A future buyer of Me & the Bees Lemonade would have to assess whether the brand can keep its customers through an ownership change. Production agreements, retailer relationships, trademarks and supply of key ingredients would matter to that judgment. Ulmer's continuing association with the mission could also affect a transaction if the buyer needed her participation in marketing. Until a sale occurs, the clearest opportunities to build value are changes the company can make itself, such as improving shipping economics and increasing demand for each retail placement.
Wealth, Income & Financial Trends
Net Worth & Sources of Wealth
Wealth & Income Analysis
Ulmer's ownership interest in Me & the Bees Lemonade is the principal commercial asset associated with her career. Her company has documented national distribution and outside financing, but those facts do not give the value of her personal stake. A valuation of the beverage business would have to reflect profit per case, operating expenses and the capital tied up in production. Her share of that value would then depend on the equity she retains and the financial terms of the outside capital.
The $60,000 from Daymond John was investment in the company. The brand's later funding from football players also brought money to an operating business. We would separate both inflows from proceeds paid directly to Ulmer as a selling shareholder. Investment money can improve a company's prospects even when there is no payment to its founder. It can also introduce claims on future proceeds that affect what common holders receive in a transaction.
Store count says something about the availability of the drink. Emory's 2025 report of more than 600 stores indicates that the company had developed distribution well beyond its original Austin accounts. Wealth depends more on the earnings the distribution can support. Retail discounts, slow payments or rising costs can create pressure even when the brand appears on more shelves. None of the published company milestones supplies the liability and ownership figures needed for a reliable personal balance sheet.
Speaking and the 2020 release of Bee Fearless give Ulmer routes to earn outside the beverage business. A book release establishes an asset available for sale, but the royalty schedule, any advance and actual sales determine the income. The economics of speaking are similarly specific to the engagements and contracts. Ulmer's nonprofit work may contribute to recognition of her mission. Its resources serve conservation and cannot be assigned to the founder's personal wealth calculation.
Portfolio Development Over Time
Business Ownership Timeline
Business Trajectory Analysis
The move from Mikaila Ulmer's Austin lemonade stand to a bottled product required Ulmer to solve production before she could win wider distribution. Local demand mattered because it justified getting the recipe into a package a restaurant or grocery store could handle. A pilot with Whole Foods opened another stage. Success during a limited placement showed enough demand for the retailer to keep the drink, creating a route to more regular wholesale orders.
The capital and attention that followed Shark Tank in 2015 helped the company approach a national audience. The later investment by football players broadened that exposure again. We would judge the durable effect by repeat store orders rather than the amount of coverage the announcements generated. Making enough product available to meet a surge in demand is useful only if the resulting production commitments continue to match the pace of consumer sales.
Two flavor launches and the aluminum packaging change added operational complexity in 2024. A new flavor consumes inventory and manufacturing time, while changing the container alters logistics across the range. Together they create an opportunity to improve the amount earned per shipment and find new customers. The commercial evidence would be higher output per account and manageable product returns, especially after retailers cycle through the first shipments of a new package.
For Ulmer, the next stage is about increasing the productivity of the distribution Me & the Bees Lemonade has already built. A drink that sells steadily can support better production scheduling and make it easier to negotiate with new accounts. A stronger baseline also gives the company room to test additional varieties without making expansion depend on them. As of November 2026, Me & the Bees Lemonade says its drinks are available in all 50 states. That reach provides a base for the work, while shelf velocity and the cash absorbed by inventory will determine how much value further expansion can create for its owners.
Ownership Misconceptions Explained
Whole Foods owns Me & the Bees Lemonade.
Whole Foods has carried the drink and helped introduce it to grocery shoppers. That is a retailer relationship. The beverage company developed its own brand, brought in outside capital and expanded to other stores including Target and H-E-B.
BeeSweet was a separate company Ulmer sold.
BeeSweet Lemonade was the name the business used early in its history. The company later traded under the Me & the Bees Lemonade name while continuing to develop the same core beverage business and its associated conservation mission.
Shark Tank made Ulmer personally $60,000 richer.
The $60,000 was an investment in the beverage company. Capital received by a business can pay for manufacturing and distribution. Its effect on a founder’s personal finances depends on the transaction terms, retained ownership and the company’s later performance.
Healthy Hive’s conservation assets belong to Mikaila Ulmer.
Healthy Hive is a nonprofit Ulmer founded to support pollinators. Its activities serve conservation and education. The beverage business has a related mission, while equity in that company belongs to its shareholders and has a separate financial purpose.
Frequently Asked Questions
What company did Mikaila Ulmer found?
Mikaila Ulmer started Me & the Bees Lemonade in 2009. She began selling at local events in Austin and subsequently bottled the lemonade as BeeSweet. The business expanded into grocery distribution and operates under the Me & the Bees name.
How much did Daymond John invest in the lemonade company?
Emory University reports that Daymond John invested $60,000 after Ulmer pitched her business on Shark Tank in 2015. The funding supported the beverage company. It provides no current ownership percentage for either John or Ulmer.
Who else invested in Me & the Bees Lemonade?
A group of current and former NFL players led by Arian Foster invested in the company, as the NFL reported in 2017. The group joined as investors in the business, while Ulmer continued to build the beverage brand.
What products does Me & the Bees Lemonade make?
The company sells packaged lemonade in Classic, Black Cherry, Prickly Pear, Passion Fruit and Very Berry varieties. It introduced the last two in 2024 and announced a switch from glass bottles to aluminum cans that year.
What is the Healthy Hive Foundation?
Ulmer founded the Healthy Hive Foundation in 2016, according to Emory. The nonprofit supports pollinator conservation through activities such as education and habitat protection. The related mission helps explain the beverage brand’s connection to bees and honey.
